Imagine a compliance platform is $12,000 a year. Does that sound like a lot?
The answer is contingent on what it replaces.
If automated collection eliminates hundreds of hours tedious evidence collection across a complicated technology-driven environment, $12,000 could be a good investment. If a startup with seven employees could gather the same data manually in a few minutes every month, the cost will be very different.
This is a great way to locate Vanta alternatives. Don’t begin with asking which platform offers the most features. Ask your company how these features will help you save time and money.
Automation has an economic break-even The Key
Automation of compliance isn’t always good or bad. The scale of the business can affect its value. Imagine a technology firm which is growing, several cloud environments, a variety of applications and frequent changes in access. The burden of manually collecting evidence over time could become extremely heavy. Integrations that automatically monitor systems and collect evidence could easily justify the cost.
Imagine a startup with 10 employees in preparation for their first SOC 2. It might have a smaller infrastructure, and the gathering of evidence can be managed with no significant automation.
It is important to know the difference when you are evaluating Vanta pricing. Although an advanced platform might provide a variety of capabilities, they are only valuable when an organization is in need of them.
Compare Architecture, not Just Brands
A search for Vanta and Drata can quickly become a feature-by -feature test. It is essential to look at the features, services and contracts offered by each platform. Both are reputable compliance platforms that focus on integrations and automation.
Another decision needs to be made first, however. Is your company interested in an integration-driven platform to help with compliance? Certain companies require constant monitoring as well as automated collection of evidence. Some businesses prefer to provide their own evidence, especially when workload is modest.
Vanta Competitors Don’t Follow the Same Model
Many well-known Vanta competitors compete within a similar automation-focused category. There are other platforms which focus on organization and extensive system connectivity.
CertAssist is in the second category. It was developed by compliance consultants and internal auditors, CertAssist organizes framework controls in a central workspace, offers editable policies and evidence guidelines, and allows auditors to examine evidence submitted via the use of read-only access.
It deliberately does not connect to operating systems, nor install infrastructure agents. Customers upload their own evidence.
Factor System Access Into the Decision
The removal of integrations comes with a clear disadvantage: one must collect evidence manually.
It also eliminates integration setup and this means that the compliance application doesn’t require standing connection to the organisation’s operational environment.
Both architectures are equally good. It is essential to inquire what choices make sense to your business.
CertAssist aims at teams that have between five and 200 employees and provides pricing information rather than having to have a sales conversation. The price for the initial launch is $225 monthly, which is a significant reduction from the standard cost of $375 per month.
Let Complexity Find Its Proper Place
What is required of a startup with 10 employees aren’t necessarily similar to the needs of the company that has 100 or 500 workers.
While compliance is simple an easy platform can be a good idea. As employees, systems, frameworks, and evidence requirements multiply, the economics can eventually favor greater automation. It’s a more efficient way to buy compliance software to let complexity earn its rightful place.
Don’t pay for fifty integrations just because they look impressive on a comparison chart. Pay for them only if the manual job they replace becomes the more expensive option.
